The Steffen House - A Molasses Desugarization Effort That Couldn't Gain Traction

Whatever happened to the Steffen House, oncefrowned upon by those who relied upon rivers for
a critical feature of beet sugar factories, especiallyother industrial purposes, including fishing. In time,
in Europe? A Steffen House was considered somolasses, which is basically a sugar syrup that has
essential to the economic success of a beetbeen through the factory a number of times and
sugar factory that a major player in the businessis by the process of elimination mostly sugarbeet
of building and operating beet sugar factories inwaste containing fifty percent sucrose, found a
the earliest days of the 20th Century, Henryvariety of markets. Early on, it became a source
Oxnard, said he would not accept a contract toof ethyl alcohol but lost favor for many years
build a sugar factory unless it included a Steffenbecause of the low cost of foreign crude oil.
House.Interest in ethyl alcohol production would revive in
A key measurement of a beet factory'sthe 1970's when crude oil prices rose. Molasses is
performance then and now is the percent ofalso a principal raw material for the production of
sucrose in molasses. The appearance of anybaker's yeast and is a major source for the
sucrose in molasses is evidence that sugarproduction of monosodium glutamate (MSG) and
intended for the warehouse, ended up, instead, incitric acid. However the volume demanded by
molasses. In Oxnard's day, molasses was deemedthose users was low compared to the quantity
a waste product and as such was often pouredmade available by the nation's beet sugar
into the rivers abutting a sugar factory. Typically,companies. The price of molasses was low as a
in a standard factory lacking a Steffen House, orconsequence.
in this more modern period, an ion-exchangeThe 1970's saw attitudes about factory waste
process, beet molasses will consist of fiftychange from acceptance by the general public to
percent sucrose, an unacceptable loss to thosea near total rejection of the premise that because
engaged in the management of a beet factory.of the good factories do (provide useful products
Factory superintendents refer to the presence ofand economic strength) their waste products
sugar in molasses as "purity". High purities, then,must be tolerated. Thus the Steffens process
reflect high sugar losses to molasses - the samewhich produced liquid waste bearing high alkalinity
as pouring money down the drain.and pH as well as high organic content and
Molasses production is generally equal to fiveconsequent malodorous compounds became
percent on beets processed, thus a factory rununwelcome. A Steffens House discharged waste
of 1,000,000 tons of beets could result in thewater in amounts as great as eight hundred
production of 50,000 tons of molasses whichpercent of the volume of molasses processed.
would contain roughly 25,000 tons of sugar whichVarious studies indicated that it was possible to
would have a market value of ten million dollars,ameliorate the strength of the odors emanating
assuming sugar is sold at $.20 per pound, net offrom Steffen waste. The cost, however, to install
manufacturing costs. It should go without sayingand operate effective systems would offset the
that the prevention of the loss of sugar toeconomic gains provided by the process. Thus
molasses is a paramount challenge to beetfactory managers who employed the Steffens
factory managers. Since early, technologyprocess began shutting them down and those
captured as much sugar as permitted bywho desired the benefits of such a process,
equipment then extant, the next curative was tolooked elsewhere. In addition to its shortcomings
remove sugar from molasses. That became theon the environmental front, the Steffens process
role of the Steffen House.recovered only about 60% of the sugar in
The Steffen process was a method formolasses. Sugar manufacturers began looking
extracting sugar from molasses invented by Carlelsewhere for a solution to the task of recovering
Steffen a Vienna born Austrian who patented thesugar from molasses. Seeping into their thoughts
process in 1883 while engaged in sugarwas the idea that it would be better to avoid
manufacture in Moravia. While his method hasmaking molasses in the first place. They turned to
several variations, the process basically begins byion exchange, a process that would forestall the
diluting molasses with water (enough to create amaking of molasses in the traditional sense.
solution of 5-12% sucrose) and cooling it to aIon exchange, or deionization, is a method of
very low temperature (below 18 degrees C) afterreducing impurities from juice which then allows
which finely powdered lime (Calcium oxide) infor increased extraction of sugar. The principle of
sufficient quantity to establish a relationship of 130ion exchange has been known for more than 125
percent to the sucrose content is continuouslyyears but seldom used in the beet sugar industry
added with agitation at a uniform and slow rate.because of its unfortunate habit of increasing the
The sugar in the molasses combines with the limesodium content of sugar juices which retards the
and a saccharage of lime is formed which isability of sugar to crystallize. However, later-day
insoluble in the liquid. The saccharate was thensugar manufacturers have turned to the practice
separated and washed in a filter press. The cakeof ion-exclusion chromatography which was first
from the filter press (saccharate of lime) wasused successfully to produce high fructose corn
mixed with sweet water to a consistency ofsyrup (HFCS). The process is based on the
cream and took the place of milk of lime in theexclusion of ionic compounds and the inclusion of
carbonation process.nonionic compounds.
About ninety percent of the sugar originally in theMolasses, then, once regarded as a thief who
beet was extracted in those factories thatcaptured huge volumes of valuable sugar during
employed the Steffen process. In some facilities,the sugar manufacturing process had been made,
the waste water from the Steffen process,at last, to give up its plunder via ion exchange
which was rich in fertilizing qualities (primarilywhere the sugar recovery rates reach ninety
potassium sulfate), was used for irrigating landspercent compared to sixty percent in the old
adjoining the factory. The structure designed toSteffens House and without negative
accommodate the equipment employed in theenvironmental impact. And yet another bonus
Steffen process became generally referred to inawaited sugar factories that turned to ion
the industry as the "Steffen's House".exchange.
The Steffen process won quick popularity inModern factories beginning in the 1990's began
Europe but found less favor in the United Statesproducing betaine from molasses, a valued food
most likely because the process was moreadditive with additional medicinal benefits. The
sophisticated in terms of its associated chemistryUniversity of Maryland Medical Center noted in
than any process introduced into a beet factoryone of its studies that inexpensive wines that use
up until that time. The first such process wasbeet sugar to increase the alcohol content, contain
installed in 1888 at Watsonville, California. It was abetaine. Some experts suggest that this may
small pilot plant with three 5-foot coolers suppliedexplain why wine drinkers from France tend to
by the Grevenbroich Machinery Company ofhave low rates of heart disease despite diets high
Germany. Grevenbroich eventually supplied muchin fat and cholesterol. More cogent, however, is
of the equipment for three pioneer Californiathe value of betaine as a feed supplement for
factories, Watsonville, Los Alamitos, and Chino andchickens and pigs. A number of experiments
continued to supply Oxnard's Steffen processshow that the addition of betaine to the feeds
equipment until his company and Kilbyimproves performance. Also, studies with pigs
Manufacturing of Cleveland, Ohio, began producingindicate an effect of betaine in energy metabolism
improved models a few years later.and a sharp increase in growth hormones.
In the United States, the roster of accomplishedHumans, too, are finding uses for betaine as a
chemists who held lead positions in beet factoriesfood supplement under a different name,
was slim. Often factory superintendents hewed totrimethylglycine or TMG.
tried and true technology of the past, preferringThus, the Steffen process, once the savior of
methods learned from experience rather thansugar manufactures fell into disrepute because of
scholarship. Guided by practical experience insteadenvironmental and cost concerns but made way
of theory, they would without malice reject ideasfor the more efficient and environmentally friendly
and methods for which they lacked a basis forion exchange.
understanding. The Watsonville experimentalSources:
Steffens process was little used, for example,GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY, The
because the factory superintendent "did notTechnology of Beet Sugar Manufacture, The
believe in it."Great Western Sugar Company, Denver,
The primary attraction of the Steffen process layColorado, June 30, 1920 - an instruction manual
in comparative advantage. Molasses was then anprepared largely by D. J. Roach for use by the
unwanted commodity and presented itself moreoperating employees of the company's beet
as a waste issue than a salable product. Removingsugar factories.
sugar from molasses was regarded as gettingGUTLEBEN, Dan, The Sugar Tramp-1954-
good value from something that would otherwiseMichigan, Printed by: Bay City Duplicating Co, San
be discharged into the river, a practice that wasFrancisco, 1954
from the earliest days of the U.S. beet industryMcGINNIS, R.A. (Ed.