| Abstract: This article presents the comparison of | | | | cup are carried out in constant temperature and |
| two test methods of water vapor permeability. | | | | humidity atmosphere before and during test, the |
| Taking Labthink TSY-W3 electrolyzation as an | | | | needed volume of test atmosphere is rather big, |
| example, it also briefs on the test advantages of | | | | which is not beneficial to the controlling of |
| sensor method. | | | | atmospheric temperature and humidity. |
| Keywords: water vapor permeability, sensor | | | | According to the type of the employed sensor, |
| method, cup method, temperature controlling | | | | sensor method is divided into infrared sensor |
| | | | | method, electrolyzing analysis method and |
| The content of water vapor within package can | | | | dynamic relative humidity method. The former |
| cause qualitative changes to some products. | | | | two methods are very similar in terms of test |
| Special attention should be paid to water vapor | | | | structure and test principle. In these two |
| permeability of packing materials, which will vary | | | | methods, the specimen is sealed in the upper and |
| significantly to different materials. Therefore, | | | | lower chambers. One side of the specimen |
| water vapor permeability test becomes very | | | | maintains high humidity state with saturated saline |
| important. There are many factors influencing the | | | | solution while the other side keeps dry by purging |
| test of water vapor permeability, with the stability | | | | dry gases. In this way, two sides of the specimen |
| of test temperature and the humidity difference | | | | form a specific humidity difference. Water vapor |
| on two sides of the specimen as the most | | | | transmitting through specimen into dry chamber |
| influential factors on test results. | | | | will be carried by dry carrier gas to the sensor, |
| 1 The Importance of Temperature Controlling in | | | | where the content of water vapor is measured |
| Water Vapor Permeability Test | | | | to determine the water vapor permeance. |
| Most of the crystalline polymers are | | | | Instruments based on these two test principles |
| semi-crystalline polymer. Theoretically, crystallized | | | | possess better working independence and the |
| part of the polymer is thought as an area that | | | | needed volume of test chambers is very small, |
| cannot be permeated during the diffusion of | | | | which make the controlling of temperature and |
| infiltration molecules within polymer material. It is | | | | humidity easy. Dynamic relative humidity method |
| the non-crystalline part that most of the diffusion | | | | varies with the former two methods in terms of |
| takes place. The longer the polymer molecule | | | | test principle. Temperature controlling of this |
| chain, the more its conformation will be. When | | | | method is easy to realize. However, due to its |
| temperature increases, conformation changing of | | | | test principle, humidity difference on two sides of |
| the molecule chain will be accelerated as a result | | | | the specimen is constantly changing during the |
| of thermal motion and this in turn will decrease | | | | test process. |
| the extent of polymerization. Then the diffusion | | | | 4 The Advantages of Sensor Method Water |
| of infiltration molecule in the polymer is | | | | Vapor Permeability Tester in Temperature and |
| accelerated. That is to say, a rising in temperature | | | | Humidity Controlling |
| will reduce the barrier property of material. | | | | Volume is one of the main factors to realize |
| The permeation of water vapor to polymers is | | | | constant temperature and humid in certain space. |
| significantly influenced by temperature. Its relation | | | | The smaller the volume is, the better the |
| with temperature can be demonstrated by | | | | controlling effect of temperature and humidity will |
| Arrhenius equation. | | | | be. As stated above, instrument structure of |
| With the rising of temperature, the coefficient of | | | | sensor method makes the controlling of constant |
| water vapor permeability increases, though the | | | | temperature and humidity easier to realize than |
| increase varies in terms of different polymer | | | | cup method and can obtain ideal controlling effect |
| films. It is stated in some literature that the | | | | with special technological treatment. Here we take |
| coefficient of water vapor permeability of | | | | Labthink TSY-W3 as an example for explanation. |
| amorphous materials increases rapidly with the | | | | Labthink TSY-W3 of electrolyzed method adopts |
| rising of temperature while that of materials with | | | | the high precision electrolyzing humidity sensor. Its |
| certain crystallinty increases somehow slower. | | | | salient feature is using constant recycled water to |
| 2 The Influence of Humidity Difference on Test | | | | maintain the temperature of test chamber, which |
| Data | | | | is improved on the basis of temperature |
| Because molecules of water vapor are polarized. | | | | controlling of water bath. one thing to be noted |
| During the permeable process of water vapor | | | | here is that the cycle controller possesses the |
| molecules, some polymers can adsorb water | | | | function of both heating and cooling with a |
| vapor and appear the phenomenon of swelling, by | | | | temperature range of 0?100?. The controlling |
| which inner free volume will be enlarged. Water | | | | precision is ±0.1?, which not only meets the |
| vapor permeability coefficient of materials is | | | | requirements of national and international |
| obviously related with the concentration of water | | | | standards, but also becomes the instrument with |
| vapor. Correspondingly, water vapor permeance is | | | | the most ideal temperature controlling. Using |
| also obviously affected by humidity | | | | saturated saline solution to control humidity can |
| variation?which presents as an nonlinear | | | | makes the humidity on the high humidity side |
| relationship between water vapor permeance and | | | | stable. Moreover, the low humidity side is |
| the relative humidity difference to some polymer | | | | controlled by desiccators, which can make two |
| materials. For example, the relationship between | | | | sides of the specimen have a very stable |
| water vapor permeance of hydrophilic polymer | | | | pressure difference with small fluctuation. The |
| cellophane and the humidity difference does not | | | | more precision the temperature and humidity |
| present a liner relationship, which is the most | | | | controlling is, the more beneficial it is to test data. |
| obvious difference of water vapor and common | | | | Field data repeatability of TSY-W3 is very good in |
| inorganic gases in terms of permeation within | | | | the whole test range. In addition, test period of |
| polymers. | | | | this instrument is shorter than that of cup |
| 3 the Difference of Cup method and Sensor | | | | method instruments. It presents an obvious |
| Method | | | | advantage in testing materials with lower water |
| At present, test methods employed by water | | | | vapor permeability. This kind of instruments is not |
| vapor permeability are either cup method or | | | | sensitive to the environmental shaking; and has |
| sensor method. These methods are based on | | | | effectively avoided the influence of environment |
| different test principles; and the structure of test | | | | on test efficiency. |
| instruments also varies significantly. | | | | 5 Conclusions |
| In cup method, the cup with specimen sealed | | | | Humidity and temperature of test environment |
| inside is put in constant temperature and humidity | | | | are two important factors that influence the data |
| atmosphere. Relative humidity on two sides of | | | | of water vapor permeability testing. Therefore, an |
| the specimen is controlled by desiccant or | | | | effective controlling of the two factors can |
| saturated saline solution inside the cup and by the | | | | improve precision and repeatability of test data. |
| constant temperature and humidity atmosphere. | | | | Comprehensively speaking, Labthink TSY-W3 |
| Water vapor permeability can be calculated with | | | | presents strong test advantages in aspects of |
| the measured weight increase or decrease of the | | | | temperature and humidity controlling. |
| cup. Test atmosphere of this method is provided | | | | |
| by constant temperature and humidity. The | | | | Labthink Instruments Co., Ltd. |
| humidity is the difference of inside cup humidity | | | | No. 144 Wuyingshan Road, Jinan 250031, China |
| and atmospheric humidity. Since operations of the | | | | Tracy Bao info@labthink. |