Season of Waste

Believe it or not, the official holiday season is onlypay for a really nice Christmas party for all of
a matter of weeks away. But, with all theAmerican industry, including the cocktail weiners.
discussion of how or relatively disappointing lastHowever, Environmental Leader noted a couple of
year's "black Friday" kick off for holiday shoppingmonths back that while these efforts might be
was, and how many sales retailers will rack up thissaving and making money for Wal-Mart, it's
year before it's all over, there's only one thing wecosting manufacturers more:
know for certain -- for every gift bought and"Wal-Mart's packaging initiative pressures
received, there's packaging to go with it.marketers to invest substantially upfront to
On December 25th, millions upon million of U.S. andreduce packaging and energy use - estimated at
European homes will be strewn with enough sheer$100 million for Procter & Gamble in the case
mass of stuff to build...well, something really bigof laundry-detergent compaction. The savings in
and probably really ugly. Some of this refuse willshipping costs and packaging materials that could
be recycled, of course, but not nearly enough. Aoffset that appear to be going toward giving
lot of it will end it will still end up in landfills  andbetter prices to Wal-Mart and its customers,
generally contributing to any number of seriousrather than to the marketer."
environmental woes, and that's just one very bigSo, while not all companies will face that large a bill
day out of 365.for redesigning their products, once again
And that goes to the issue of sustainabledesigners and manufacturers are left on the horns
packaging and is one of the things we think aboutof a marketing/production/ethical dilemma. Ideally,
at my industrial design firm. What was oncethe best way to solve this problem is to
mostly an ethical question for designers andsomehow find solutions  that are attractive,
manufacturers has become a financial one as thesustainable, and inexpensive  -- but that golden
public becomes increasingly concerned with greentrio of attributes is usually more dream than
issues like global warming. This became a fiscallyreality. There are always trade-offs.
urgent matter for many companies whenOne solution is to charge more. Some consumers,
Wal-Mart, increasingly controversial for its laborin some markets, don't mind paying a little more
and competitive practices, sought to soften itsfor a product they are sure is less harmful to the
image among more environmentally conscious andenvironment -- but others won't. Another solution
or progressive-leaning consumers by advancingin some instances is to use bare bones, no-frills
green initiatives.packaging. In theory, customers may say they
In 2005, the retail mega-giant introduced adon't really care how nice the packaging looks on
sustainable packaging program in partnership witha given product; but we also know that
the environmentally oriented NatureWorks thatconsumers tend to ignore "ugly" products,
they promised would reduce fuel consumption andregardless of their feelings about the environment.
cut greenhouse gas emissions by some 11 millionOther packaging problems, like the hated clam
pounds. Another initiative built around Wal-Mart'sshells, are determined by retailer concerns that
in-house toy line was said to have saved 5,190can't be ignored.
trees along with significants amounts of materialsThis is another issue where there are few easy
and fuel.answers, and one that's not going away, either.
By the fall of last year, Wal-Mart was introducingWe're intrigued by the work of the corporate
its new "packaging scorecard" touting not only thebacked Sustainable Packaging Coalition. Their vision
plan's environmental benefits, but a fiscal one asstatement is worth reading and strikes us as a
well -- the plan was projected to save an amountsensible first step.  And, of course, Nectar is
just shy of $11 billion, which would be enough toworking on it.