| Abstract: although barrier property is one of the | | | | container packaging that cannot be sealed |
| key parameters affecting shelf life of products, | | | | repeatedly. When desiccant and its holding |
| traditional water vapor permeability test methods | | | | accessories are placed into specimen container, a |
| still fall short not only in test efficiency but also in | | | | opening needs to be made on the wall of package |
| terms of operation conveniences. For that reason, | | | | and is then sealed with seal wax after the placing |
| a method that can rapidly determine water vapor | | | | of desiccant and the accessories has finished. |
| permeability of package is introduced in this | | | | However, such operation is repeated each time |
| article.keywords: water vapor permeability, | | | | the specimen is weighed, which not only increases |
| container, test, and electrolytic method | | | | the difficulty of operation, but also increases the |
| Containers are directly used in liquid package. Since | | | | ratio of test failure. |
| raw material of containers is often processed with | | | | 3. Poor repeatability. Operators' habit of |
| high temperature and cooling, some indexes of | | | | specimen preparation and weighing will affect test |
| the raw material cannot indicate the final | | | | results. |
| properties of container. The special shape of | | | | In addition, because precision of gravimetric |
| container adds difficulty to its barrier property | | | | sensor is restricted by its measuring range, the |
| testing. In the past, gas permeance and water | | | | precision of container package testing is much |
| vapor permeability are estimated by testing | | | | poorer than that of film testing. At the same |
| package sheet material. However, container | | | | time, unit of the test results in this method is g |
| packages are not uniform in thickness and the | | | | m2·30d, indicating the need to accurately |
| property of materials will be changed in the | | | | measure surface area of container package, |
| process of production, which will cause certain | | | | which presents another problem for container |
| disparity between estimated and tested results. | | | | package of irregular shape. |
| Traditional water vapor permeability test methods | | | | 4. Test Water Vapor Permeability Using Sensor |
| still fall short not only in test efficiency but also in | | | | Method |
| their operation conveniences. For that reason, a | | | | Test principle of sensor method water vapor |
| method that can rapidly determine water vapor | | | | permeability testing for container package is the |
| permeability of package is introduced in this article. | | | | same with that of gas permeability testing, which |
| 1. Traditional Methods to Determine Water Vapor | | | | forms a good basis in the actual application of |
| Permeability of Containers | | | | sensor method. |
| The commonly used methods of package water | | | | STRONG>The first thing is specimen |
| vapor permeability testing at present are | | | | preparation. The method of preparation is almost |
| developed on the basis of gravimetric method film | | | | the same with that of package oxygen |
| water vapor permeability testing, using test | | | | permeability test. However, specimen placement |
| principle of gravimetric method. Relevant test | | | | varies to specific testing position. Water vapor |
| standards are GB/T 6981-1986?GB/T 6982-1986 | | | | permeability testing of container package includes |
| and ASTM D 3079-94. According to the nature of | | | | water vapor permeability test of bottle body and |
| materials, there are water vapor permeability | | | | the integral test of bottle cap and bottle body. To |
| testing of flexible package and rigid package. | | | | test barrier property of bottle body, the package |
| Although these two methods vary to some | | | | should be laid upside down and fixed onto special |
| extent in their detailed operation procedures, the | | | | bottle pedestal. Then seal bottle neck by filling |
| basic test methods are similar. | | | | special glue into bottle pedestal in order to avoid |
| Test procedures are as below: put desiccant | | | | the transmission of water vapor from connecting |
| (holding accessories can be used) into sample | | | | place of bottle pedestal and bottleneck into bottle |
| container and then seal the container. Quickly | | | | body. Generally, the finished specimen is shown as |
| place the preheated specimen into constant | | | | figure 1. To test barrier property of bottle cap |
| humidity and temperature cell for moist heat | | | | and bottle body, make a hole on the bottom of |
| testing. After that, the specimen should be | | | | container first. It is recommended that the size of |
| weighed periodically according to water vapor | | | | this hole just fits the inlet pipe and outlet pipe of |
| permeability of materials. When the transmission | | | | nitrogen gas. Place the bottle upward on the |
| reaches equilibrium, calculate water vapor | | | | center of tailor-made bottle pedestal then fill the |
| permeance of the specimen using the increment | | | | sealing glue evenly into between bottle body and |
| of specimen’s weight. | | | | bottle pedestal. Make sure that the space |
| Although this method is developed on the basis of | | | | between bottom recess and input and output |
| gravimetric method film testing, automatic | | | | pipes is also filled with sealing glue. |
| detection is hard to realize. Therefore this method | | | | 1. Replace the upper test chamber of sensor |
| has the disadvantages of inconveniences in | | | | method film water vapor permeability tester with |
| empirical application, lower test efficiency and | | | | special enclosure (attached with instrument), and |
| lower credibility of test results, with the ones | | | | then use the package to divide the permeation |
| listed below being the obvious weak points: | | | | chambers into two independent airflow systems |
| Longer test duration. According to specifications | | | | (see figure 3) with one side being flowing test gas |
| of standards, to determine transmission | | | | (dry) and the other side maintain certain humidity. |
| equilibrium, at least three weight data should be | | | | The concentration of water vapor on two sides |
| obtained. Although weighing interval of specimen is | | | | of specimen is different and there is a constant |
| decided by operators in accordance with water | | | | concentration difference of water vapor existing |
| vapor permeability of packaging materials, the | | | | (relative humidity). Under the function of |
| interval below is recommended in standards: for | | | | concentration difference of water vapor (relative |
| materials possessing high water vapor barrier | | | | humidity), water vapor transmits through the wall |
| property, the shortest weighing interval | | | | of container and is then diverted into the sensor |
| recommended is 2?3 days. While for lower water | | | | by carrier gas. Water vapor transmission rate of |
| vapor barrier materials, a interval of 15?30 days is | | | | the package can be calculated according to the |
| recommended. In this way, even packages made | | | | quantity of water vapor contained in carrier gas, |
| of very lower barrier materials needs seven or | | | | which is accurately measured by the sensor. |
| eights days to complete one test. To test | | | | Labthink TSY-W3 electrolytic method water |
| container package that is made of high barrier | | | | vapor permeability tester can test integral water |
| materials, several months are needed. | | | | vapor permeability of container package with the |
| The test cannot be completed under a stable | | | | precision no less than 0.001g/pkg·d. Generally, |
| condition. During weighing process, the specimen | | | | the duration of test is only three or four days, |
| (or desiccant and its holding accessories) is moved | | | | thus realizes rapid and accurate determination of |
| between test environment and weighing | | | | water vapor permeability testing. Comparing with |
| environment. In principle, transmission of water | | | | relevant parameters of tradition test method |
| vapor should be tested under an equilibrium state. | | | | previously introduced, TSY-W3 is outstanding both |
| But the movement during weighing will destroy | | | | in aspects of test precision and test efficiency. |
| transmission equilibrium established under test | | | | 6. Conclusion |
| state, which in turn affect accuracy of test | | | | Traditional test method for integral water vapor |
| results. Moreover, the shorter the weighing | | | | permeability testing of package is low in efficiency |
| interval, the more obvious the affection will be. | | | | and precision, which impedes the development of |
| There is also such explanation in standards. For | | | | integral water vapor permeability testing of |
| example, it is clearly pointed out in standards that | | | | container package. That is why the traditional |
| frequent weighing affects accuracy of test. | | | | method does not obtain better application in the |
| A stable differential pressure of water vapor is | | | | past years. Sensor method makes a significant |
| hard to maintain on two sides of specimen. | | | | progress in testing integral water vapor |
| Because the weight of desiccant contained in | | | | permeability of package and can test water |
| specimen container usually limits to 80-100g, | | | | vapor permeability of almost all current flexible |
| moisture absorption ability of desiccant decreases | | | | packages (including package bag, paper box and |
| after a period of test. Correspondingly, differential | | | | bottle), which can provide more accurate and |
| pressure on two sides of specimen will also | | | | overall test data in comprehensively investigating |
| change. In such a case, the desiccant should be | | | | the influence of water vapor permeability on shelf |
| replaced to continue test. However, the desiccant | | | | life of inner packed matters. |
| can hardly be replaced completely consistent in | | | | Further information please feel free to contact |
| quantity. Therefore, test will be influenced to | | | | Shirley Wu via trade2@labthink.cn, |
| some extent. | | | | skype:shirley-labthink, or (tel)0086-531-85068709. |
| 2. The sealing lacks reliability, especially for | | | | |