Present Situation and Prospects of Gravimetric Method Water Vapor Permeability Testing

Abstract: test accuracy and test repeatability ofnot exceed 10%(there is similar specification for
water vapor permeability testing using gravimetrichygroscopic capacity of other desiccant), there is
method are controversial at present. Theno data proof whether hygroscopic capacity of
expansibility of gravimetric method and whetherdesiccant changes obviously when its hygroscopic
gravimetric method will be replaced by newmoisture content approaches the upper limit.
methods have become the focus of concern. ThisHowever, water method of gravimetric method
article presents a systematic analysis of testdoes not have the above defects and has realized
principle, present situation and prospects ofautomatic testing at present. Then why the
gravimetric method.improvement of water method could not attract
Keyword: water vapor permeability?gravimetricenough attention? The author thinks that this is
method?cup methodrelated with the misunderstanding of GB/T 1037
Oxygen and water vapor have obvious influenceamong some insiders. ASTM E96 is the most
on active substance of food, pharmaceuticals andwidespread and historic water vapor
some cosmetics, which make chemical propertypermeability-testing standard. It is also the most
of these products unstable. Therefore,excellent standard in terms of its completeness of
commercial packaging usually raises demand ondescribing test methods. This standard
barrier property of specimen materials. Atsimultaneously introduces these two test
present, the fundamental method of water vapormethods: desiccant method and water method,
permeability testing-gravimetric method isboth of which are considered as fundamental test
provoking criticism in terms of its test efficiencymethods, and should be selected according to
and test repeatability, etc. The expansibility ofapplication environment of materials in actual test.
gravimetric method and whether gravimetricOther water vapor permeability testing standards,
method will be replaced have become the focussuch as GB/T 1037, do not have such complete
of concern. This article presents a systematicdescription of test methods. The first edition GB
analysis of test principle, present situation and1037-70 ‘Determination of Water Vapor
prospect of gravimetric method.Transmission Rate for Plastics' simultaneously
1. Gravimetric Methodincludes gravimetric method and water
1.1 Principle of Gravimetric Methodmethod. However, the revised edition GB
In gravimetric method, the two sides of specimen1037-88 ‘Determination of Water Vapor
maintain a certain pressure difference at aTransmission Rate for Plastic Films and
specified temperature. Then the weight variationSheets-Cup Method' simplifies its description of
of permeable cup is measured using gravimetricwater method and only lists the method of
balance or analyzing balance. Based on the size,putting desiccant into permeable cup when
thickness, weighing interval and humidityexplaining how to realize relative humidity, which
difference on two sides of specimen, watermakes some users think that it is not allowable to
vapor permeability parameters can be calculated.use distilled water or other reagents. However,
Since the characteristic testing component inthe emphasis upon GB 1037-88 on ‘cup
gravimetric method is permeable cup, this methodmethod' in the standard title indicates that its
is also called cup method. Although certain relativecontent does not confines to ‘desiccant
humidity difference is specified in gravimetricmethod' only. It is because the above-mentioned
method as its testing condition, it is not pointedmisunderstandings that results in the cold
out which side should be the high humility side.reception of water method, which actually
Therefore, whether the inner permeable cup toconforms to GB/T 1037. At the same time,
be the high humidity side and outer cup to be thevarious investigation rules including present market
dry side?water method?or vise versa (desiccantaccess QS certification requires implementation of
method) conforms to test principle of gravimetricGB/T 1037 gravimetric method, and not confining
method.to desiccant method.
1.2 Data Comparison Between Desiccant MethodIn addition, the impact of sensor method makes
and Water Methodsome people violate justice in evaluating desiccant
Whether test data obtained by two methodsmethod. Although some people speak highly of
based on the same test principle, i.e., desiccantsensor method, they do not have any actual
method and water method, are consistent hasapplication experience. Test parameters and the
become the concern of the whole testingreasonability of precision will not be discussed in
industry. According to test process and calculatethis article. The limitation of desiccant method in
formula provided in ASTM E96, test data of theterms of specimen thickness and specimen sealing
two methods should be consistent under perfectalso exists in those traditional sensor methods.
condition. However, such deduction is lessMoreover, the sealing problem is still a key factor
persuasive than actual comparison. In 2007,restraining lower test limit of testing instrument.
proficiency testing to ‘Barrier PropertyTherefore, in terms of test principle, the lower
Testing for Plastic Package Material-Determinationtest limit of several water vapor testing methods
of Oxygen and Water Vapor Transmission Rate'should be consistent.
is held in our country nationwide, which is3. Prospects of Gravimetric Method
sponsored by CNCA and organized by NationalIn 2007 barrier property proficiency testing, 85?
Packaging Product Inspection and Testing Centerof the participators use gravimetric method
(Jinan). There are altogether 67 labs (all theinstruments. And system error of all these
domestic authoritative testing institutions arelaboratories is within the allowable range of our
participated) participating in the testing of watercountry. Statistical data from this proficiency
vapor transmission rate (66 labs providedtesting have confirmed the fundamental position
effective test data and 10 labs did not adoptof gravimetric method, which simultaneously
gravimetric method). This proficiency testing isrefutes those reports about lower accuracy of
unprecedented in the world in terms of its scale,gravimetric method.
testing level of the members and authority of itsHowever, we must admit that the improvement
organizers. Based on the results of dataspace of desiccant method is becoming more and
comparison, field test data of desiccant methodmore restricted. With the accelerating of
and water method have no obvious difference.automatic testing process, its development is
2?Present Situation of Gravimetric Methodobviously lagging behind other test methods. The
2.1 Present Situationpleasant thing is that problems encountered by
It is undeniable that the formulation and thedesiccant method during the course of its
implementation of GB/T 1037 play a ratherdevelopment can be well solved by water
important role in the wide application ofmethod. Liquids such as distilled water contained in
gravimetric method. At the same time, the salientpermeable cups of water method can maintain
features of gravimetric method in terms of itslong-term water vapor concentration stably
easy operation and lower price of testwithout frequent human interference. Now the
instruments also accelerate the popularization ofhighly efficient and convenient automatic testing
instruments using this method. During itsinstrument using water method has been
application in the past twenty years, the negativeintroduced to the market. Actual application has
evaluation of gravimetric method is occurred nowproved that desiccant method testing needs three
and then. Moreover, with the introducing of newdays while full automatic water method
testing methods and the intensifying need toinstruments only needs several hours to complete
replace traditional instruments; such negativethe test. Test efficiency of water method
evaluation becomes more prominent. Theinstruments is no less inferior to that of sensor
negative side mainly exists in aspects of lowermethod instrument. Moreover, full automatic
test efficiency, accuracy and repeatability. Thusinstruments possess advantages in terms of test
the newly rising sensor method instrumentsaccuracy and repeatability. 
become more favorable, which is thought to beTo develop water method, the content of GB/T
more suitable to the booming development of1037 should be further improved to eliminate
present flexible packaging industry.misunderstandings of GB/T 1037 in the society,
2.2 Analysis of Present Application Statusavoiding the ideas that ‘water method does
Is gravimetric method is really impractical as isnot belong to gravimetric method'. At present, to
reported? When analyzing the reasons, it is notupdate their testing instruments, several
difficult to discover that those defects ofauthoritative testing institutions in our country
gravimetric method mainly result from the usinghave already began to purchase full automatic
of desiccant method instruments. In fact, thereinstruments using water method and stopped
are indeed weak points in desiccant method.purchasing desiccant method instruments, which
However, these problems are mainly result fromindicates that they believe water method
the difference between testing environment andconforms to GB/T 1037. Although electrolytic
weighing environment and the difficulty to maintainsensor method water vapor permeability testing
a stable pressure difference of water vapor onstandard was approved in 2007, the applications
two sides of specimen in a long term (testof this new method would not shake the position
environment is not stable). This is especiallyof gravimetric method, just as the issuing of GB
obvious for specimens with better hygroscopicT 19789 did not shake the authoritative
capacity. Although consolidation of testingposition of differential-pressure method (in the
environment can solve errors caused by2007 proficiency testing of barrier property, 74?
environmental changes, concentration differenceparticipators use differential pressure method
of water vapor on two sides of specimen isinstruments) in gas permeability testing during the
maintained totally on manual operation, whichpast two years. Therefore, those who want to
makes automatic testing and the consolidation ofcompletely develop water vapor permeability
test environment difficult to realize. In addition,testing must start with gravimetric method, in
although it is specified in GB/T 1037 thatwhich popularizing and improving water method is
hygroscopic moisture content of desiccant shouldthe best way.