Eight O'Clock Coffee's Brand Image Re-design Gives Us More to Think About Than Just Visual Appeal

A discussion on LinkedIn's CPG Branding andand what problems, if any, exist with the existing
Marketing Forum caught my attention. Eightbrand identity. Re-branding is a costly proposition,
O'Clock Coffee recently launched a sweepstakesso updating a brand identity should not be taken
promotion asking consumers to vote for theirlightly or done to merely enhance an existing
choice of new packaging. In response to theidentity. I once worked on a re-branding
promotion, a LinkedIn member had posted aassessment for a company that, by acquisition,
question a couple of weeks ago asking whathad, over time, acquired multiple entities which
people thought of the new Eight O'Clock Coffeecontinued to be in use, resulting in some level of
packaging options. Specifically, the member askedconfusion among the company's customers,
"what do people think of the new options whenmaking the need for a streamlined brand very
compared to the current version?" and "what doapparent. In the case of Eight O' Clock Coffee, I
people think about companies that engagesee the brand's interest in re-branding to be
consumers in the branding process?"illustrative of a larger need: the need to grow the
Although the promotion is now over, I realizedbrand's franchise and identity beyond its core
that no one had addressed an even moreconsumers.
fundamental question of when and why a brandTherefore, I have a slightly different take on Eight
should re-brand. One cannot reasonably evaluate aO' Clock's sweepstakes than some of the people
new brand identity without understanding thewho responded to the post's questions on strictly
need for changing it in the first place. Aaesthetic bases. Eight O' Clock is a brand with a
re-branding effort should not be conducted justlot of history and equity as a bagged, whole bean,
for the sake of refreshing the image and identitypremium value brand - at about $6 per pound it is
of the brand - there must be a stronger rationalepositioned above the Folgers of the world but
or strategic basis for the decision. That maybelow many of the newer and higher priced
seem obvious, but in many instances, brandsbagged brands such as New England, Dunkin and
reset their images just because they can - a newStarbucks. In the 1920's and 1930's, Eight O'Clock
brand manager wants to imprint his/her mark onCoffee had over a quarter of the U.S. market
the business and, what better way to pump lifeshare and many of those fiercely loyal consumers
into a brand with a slow innovation pipeline than towere the ones who kept the brand going for so
conduct a re-branding on a brand that haslong. As such, it has become one of those
maintained the same look for many years.nostalgia brands with a need to maintain its
However, I believe that any owner or, for thathistoric equities and loyal consumer base while
matter, critic of a new brand identity must firstappealing to potential new customers.
understand the strategic need for a re-branding