Your ultimate packaging resource


rpma.org keyword stats



Most current MSN search phrases:

Toronto Tourist Spots follow

Fixed Cost Ediscovery Delivers Competitive Advantage in Legal Risk

Early case assessment and fixed costinformation is a competitive advantage in the
eDiscovery are two areas in legal riskworld  of  legal  wrangling.'
management that require specific attention.
Fixed cost eDiscovery is designed to addressThe competitive advantage presents itself
the financial risk associated with largebecause the legal process is full of gray
legal cases. For additional information onareas. We know, through our interview
eDiscovery go to The outcome of fixed costseries, that legal counsel will expand the
eDiscovery is reduced exposure to the costscope of any information based activity.
and time spent reviewing and analyzing theUnderstanding ones capabilities, custodians
data after a legal case is underway. Earlyand case information ahead of a
case assessment is a process that can reducemeet-and-confer meeting can mean the
legal risk exposure by offering a necessarydifference between 10 terabytes of
view into the case information, i.e.information and 10 gigabytes of information,
custodians, context, third-parties, etc. Theor roughly 600 million individual pages
latter is a legal risk competitive advantage;versus 600,000 individual pages. Legal
the  former  is  simply  cost  containment.counsel can use the fore knowledge gained
through early case assessment to steer the
Early case assessment is done by anmeet-and-confer meeting to their advantage,
organization to manage the organizationsas opposed to sharing their complete
legal risk exposure. Early case assessmentcapability.
(ECA) can be considered the artillery in the
armory that legal counsel takes to theirFixed cost eDiscovery can become a liability
meet-confer meetings. ECA includesfor some companies because the opposing
information about custodians, context andcounsel could use the published financial
concepts and will help legal counsel manageinformation their advantage. For example, if
the outcome of the meet-and-confer meetings.you told the opposing counsel you used Huron
However,  it  is not supposed to be this way.Consulting V3locity, they would know the cost
per document page is about .25cents. On the
According to The Honorable Judge Peter Flynncontrary, if you used services from KPMG, a
of the Circuit Court of Cook County, Chanceryvery guarded company, then your opposition
Division, Illinois, Meet-and-confer meeting'swould have little or no information. In
are supposed to be about putting your ITlegal, the less information your opponent
cards on the table, what one can and cannothas,  the  better  off  you  are.
do with respect to data, data types,
collections, preservations, dataUsing commodity based early case assessment
transformations, etc. Judge Flynn respondedtools may introduce legal risk your company
to a question related to guarded sharing ofmay not want to manage. For example, if the
IT capability during meet-and-confer meetingsopposing counsel has foreknowledge of the
during last weeks live Panel Discussion onproducts you use, such as Autonomy/Aungate,
Document Review Acceleration, hosted by EpiqAttenex or Clearwell Systems, they know your
Systems. He responded saying it was "Flatcapability to identify concepts, custodians,
dead wrong, sanctionable." According toetc. Using software to create legal leverage
Judge Flynn, guarding IT and ECA informationwithout sharing to the world how you do it,
during meet-and-confers is probably illegal.can improve your competitive advantage in the
His response and the participant questionearly phases of litigation.
make it clear that 'the guarding of



1 A B C 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102